Shortly after Twitter stated it would begin charging developers to use its API, company CEO Elon Musk is now somewhat reneging on that decision. Over the weekend, Musk tweeted that, after
responding to some feedback, Twitter will offer a new “light, write-only API for bots” so long as they provide “good content that is free.”
original plan was to charge users about $100 a month to use the API, allegedly to stop “bot scammers and opinion manipulators” from abusing the software (and presumably make some money to pay off the platform’s massive debts). In response, there was a massive outcry from users who said the new rules would kill a lot of useful bots and fun, gimmick accounts due to their expensive costs—as much as $3,400 a year, according to one developer. Who knows how this latest Twitter saga will eventually turn out, as a lot of things about the platform remain unsettled at this point? But, if Musk stands by this new decision, your favorite gimmick Twitter account may continue to live on, and it could be all thanks to Pepito the Cat.
Among all the feedback from this API debacle, the only post Musk responded to directly is
. The person running the account argued that the new rules could kill it, bringing up its place in Twitter history (having joined over a decade ago) and that it posts “quality content with great engagement.” one from @PepitoTheCat
Although the content in question is nothing more than the titular Pepito entering and exiting his house through a little cat door, it appears to have been enough to make Musk think twice about the rule change. Additionally, the impulsive CEO hints at giving verified Twitter users access to the API for “good content” similar to @PepitoTheCat but doesn’t explain further.
While it may seem a little silly to focus so much on a gimmick account, it calls into question what Musk considers to be “good content” in his eyes. The fact that he responded directly to @PepitoTheCat and
agonizing over how the changes would destroy research and activism projects on the platform hints at his thought process. not a developer
good, it could mean that content relating to animals or anything rather milquetoast is considered good, while accounts like @ElonJet are bad, despite not doing anything illegal. It’s difficult to get a read on anything because of how often Musk flip-flops on Twitter policies. Besides the API, he had the platform for
and links to banning journalists competing for social media sites ; both instances were met with an avalanche of backlash. Tons of questions
There are still a ton of questions on our minds, like what does a “light, write-only API” look like and how will it compare to the paid version? It’s still set to launch on February 9. Also, will the free bots made under the new rules be moderated? This could be a challenge since the company laid off large portions of its
. global moderation team
We’d ask Twitter for clarification, but the platform doesn’t have a way for the press to directly contact them outside of directly tweeting at Elon Musk, which we did. If Musk ever does answer, this story will be updated at a later time.